It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is terminated in order to avoid future law suits arising from the employment relationship. Recent cases of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario illustrate a trend in the jurisprudence toward dismissing human rights applications by employees who have signed a release. Read about these decisions and tips to make your release enforceable in our latest update
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
What is the next step in AODA compliance?
The AODA Employment Standard deadlines are not as far away as they may seem. The Employment Standard is one of…
26 May 2014
Human Rights Tribunal finds undue hardship test met
In a recent application to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Tribunal found that an employer facing an economic…
17 Oct 2011
Avoid Procedural Missteps when Accommodating Mental Disabilities in the Workplace
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has heard many cases brought by injured workers against the Workplace Safety and Insurance…
25 Aug 2017
Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
03 Mar 2017
Drug Dependency and Denial: Alberta Court of Appeal Rules Denial not a Shield to Discipline
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Employee addiction is a challenging topic for HR professionals. Under Canadian human rights legislation, drug…
27 Aug 2015
Human Rights Tribunal Rules on Family Status Protection for Infrequent and Unexpected Childcare Obligations
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…
20 Apr 2016
What mental capacity is required to sign a release?
In a past Stringer Update, Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints, we emphasized the importance of having terminated employees sign…
11 Oct 2012
Random Drug Testing Debate – National Perspective?
In April, we blogged that the Supreme Court of Canada had granted leave to appeal a decision regarding the random alcohol testing…
16 Oct 2012
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits
Supreme Court Allows Employees to “Double-Up” on Pregnancy and Parental Benefits A regular point of contention between unions and employers…
08 Dec 2014
Embracing the #MeToo Movement
#MeToo has quickly caught wind as a widespread movement that sheds light on the prevalence of sexual assault and harassment,…
18 Sep 2019
Two Kicks at the Can: Worker Allowed to Re-litigate WSIB Accommodation Dispute at the Human Rights Tribunal
Most employers are likely familiar with the WSIB return to work process which often involves a WSIB employee attending at…
12 Nov 2013
Back to Basics: HRTO Follows Figliola and Refuses to Allow Relitigation of WSIB Claim
In 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v Figliola (“Figliola”). The Figliola decision addressed the…
05 Dec 2014
BC Labour Relations Board waters down Irving Pulp
Employers are still wrestling with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on the random drug and alcohol testing…
26 May 2014
2013 Q3 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 1: AODA Update
This is segment 1 of 5 from our Q3 webinar held on Thursday, October 10, “Upcoming AODA Obligations – What You Need…
12 Oct 2013
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
WSIB Return to Work Decisions: Are they Binding on the Human Rights Tribunal? – Ryan Conlin
14 Sep 2010