Frank Portman explains two recent, landmark decisions from the Supreme Court of Canada, which may significantly restrain governments from crafting labour legislation not strictly following the “Wagner” model.
Related Posts
In OPSEU v. Ontario et. al., Ontario’s Divisional Court recently upheld an arbitrator’s ruling to dismiss 22 (grouped) grievances over fault-based…
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss Bill 146 and the potential impact on employers.
In a decision that will come as little surprise to many labour practitioners, on both sides on the union-management spectrum,…
Although the final report from The Changing Workplaces Review is not expected until later this year, the Ontario New Democratic Party (“NDP”)…
Jeff Murray discussed recent labour arbitration decisions pertaining to employee vices.
In an earlier blog, we discussed a decision by Ontario’s Divisional Court in Greater Essex County District School Board v. United Association…
In what can only be described as a fairly novel case, a Union brought a grievance to the Labour Relations Board on…
Mayor Rob Ford is planning to privatize many police janitorial jobs in his ongoing campaign to contract out city services. …
By: Jeremy Schwartz Employers often remark, with varying degrees of intention, that they would rather close up shop than manage…
Jeff Murray discussed recent labour arbitration decisions pertaining to employee vices.
Jeff Murray discusses the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision concerning the closure of a Wal-Mart store after it unionized.
The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that Walmart violated the statutory freeze in Québec’s labour legislation when it closed a store…
The law in Canada regarding random drug and alcohol testing has been inconsistent for some time, with the Alberta and…
Most of us are well aware that at about 4 a.m. this morning, the Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) ruled…
The law has become increasingly sensitive to the need for the protection of personal information from public disclosure. This is…

