Ryan Conlin discusses the potentially watershed decision in R. v. Roofing Medics, in which the court commented that more personal defendants in health and safety prosecutions should face jail sentences.
Related Posts
A recent decision, R v The Corporation of the City of Guelph et al.[1] provides a narrow interpretation of limitation periods in…
Constructors, including many owners who directly hire and oversee contractors on their properties, must have strong and meaningful safety programs in…
Date: Mar 04. 2022 The Omicron wave appears to be receding and there is cautious optimism that the worst of…
On September 4, 2020, Ryan and Jeremy discussed the legal tightrope in terms of employee attendance management, that employers must…
<p> Ryan Conlin and Landon Young both spoke at the first annual Health, Safety & Environment Conference and Trade Show…
In April, we blogged that the Supreme Court of Canada had granted leave to appeal a decision regarding the random alcohol testing…
As many readers are likely aware, the burden of proof is on an employer to establish “due diligence” in an…
As an Ontario employer, it is sometimes hard to shake the impression the standard of OH&S due diligence applied by…
Facts On one unfortunate day in July 2017, a 15-year-old boy drowned while swimming in a lake on a school…
Allison Taylor discusses progressive discipline and termination for employee misconduct.
Jeff Murray discusses a recent Alberta Court of Queens Bench decision that overturned an arbitration panel’s finding that Suncor’s random…
The obligations on employers, constructors and other workplace stakeholders once a workplace accident occurs are heavy. The Occupational Health and Safety…
By Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz The Ontario government has announced a proposed amendment to the OHSA which would impose…
A revised Bill 160 was passed on June 1st. Notable changes to the Bill include an increase in the role…

