Ryan Conlin discusses the potentially watershed decision in R. v. Roofing Medics, in which the court commented that more personal defendants in health and safety prosecutions should face jail sentences.
Related Posts
A revised Bill 160 was passed on June 1st. Notable changes to the Bill include an increase in the role…
By: Ryan J. Conlin The Ontario Court of Appeal has sent a clear message that employers convicted of criminal negligence can expect…
Ryan Conlin summarizes and comments upon the significant amendments Bill 18 has effected to Ontario’s Employment Standards Act, Workplace Safety…
The ongoing flare-up of the ebola virus is currently front page news. Notwithstanding that as of the time of this…
Health and safety lawyers Ryan Conlin and Frank Portman will dissect the various proceedings which have flowed from the Metron…
By Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz The Ontario government has announced a proposed amendment to the OHSA which would impose…
Regular readers of our blogs and updates may recall that the Ontario Government introduced Bill 160 on March 3, 2011, which proposed a number…
The integration of workplace violence and harassment protections into occupational health and safety legislation has been a theme in Canada…
Jeff Murray discusses a recent Alberta Court of Queens Bench decision that overturned an arbitration panel’s finding that Suncor’s random…
One of the most interesting questions that arose after the Bill C-45 amendments to the Criminal Code, is whether a defendant…
Ryan Conlin on Metron Ryan Conlin was recently interviewed concerning the recent, Superior Court decision sentencing Metron Construction project manager, Vadim Kazenelson, to three-and-a-half…
Jeremy Schwartz discusses the disturbing trend of employees forum shopping in human rights matters, and a recent HRTO decision which…
Do you have a policy prohibiting your employees from smoking when they drive alone in a company vehicle? If not,…
#MeToo has quickly caught wind as a widespread movement that sheds light on the prevalence of sexual assault and harassment,…
A recent decision, R v The Corporation of the City of Guelph et al.[1] provides a narrow interpretation of limitation periods in…