In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, the Court dealt with the issue of awarding legal costs in a human rights complaint. This decision provides a good reminder to employers and employees of the significance of legal costs in such proceedings. Read about this decision and the practical implications in our Latest Update.
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Human Rights Tribunal finds undue hardship test met
In a recent application to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, the Tribunal found that an employer facing an economic…
17 Oct 2011
Tribunal Awards Four Years’ Lost Wages to Job Applicant Who Lied About Immigration Status (Demo)
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently awarded $101,363.16, representing four years’ lost salary, and $15,000.00 for injury to dignity,…
24 Sep 2019
2014 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 1: Alcohol & Drug Testing Update
Ryan Conlin of Stringer LLP discusses recent jurisprudence concerning random drug and alcohol testing in Canada (post-Irving).
22 Apr 2014
Federal Court of Appeal Revises Test for Family Status Discrimination (Demo)
In another twist in the rapidly developing area of family status discrimination law, the Federal Court of Appeal recently released…
20 May 2014
Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach (Demo)
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
03 Mar 2017
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
Hypothetical Standards: Human Rights Tribunal finds Police Liable for Racism – Jeremy Schwartz
23 Dec 2009
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 3: ONCA Upholds Landmark Retroactive Loss Award
Jeremy Schwartz discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision that upheld a landmark retroactive loss of earnings award from…
19 Jul 2016
Human Rights Tribunal Discourages Unnecessary Naming of Personal Respondents in Applications (Demo)
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
07 Sep 2011
Significant Changes to the Human Rights Tribunal’s Rules (Demo)
Kelly McDermott and Jeremy Schwartz Effective July 1, 2010, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has made significant changes to…
15 Jul 2010
Stress Claim Tsunami: New Approach to WSIB Stress Claims
Ryan Conlin and Jeremy Schwartz discuss a landmark WSIAT decision which held sections of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act…
29 May 2014
2015 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 2: Retirement and Terminations (Demo)
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
21 Apr 2015
It Takes Two to Tango: Superior Court Rules on Employees’ Duty to Facilitate in the Accommodation Process (Demo)
Employers have a duty to accommodate employees with disabilities to the point of undue hardship, including facilitating the return to…
16 May 2016
Human Rights Tribunal Discourages Unnecessary Naming of Personal Respondents in Applications
In Sterling v Wendy’s Restaurant, the applicants (a former Wendy’s employee and his wife), named 14 personal respondents, who were members…
07 Sep 2011
Obese Resident Awarded Preferred Parking Space – Jeremy D. Schwartz (Demo)
Obese Resident Awarded Preferred Parking Space – Jeremy D. Schwartz
18 Feb 2010