It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is terminated in order to avoid future law suits arising from the employment relationship. Recent cases of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario illustrate a trend in the jurisprudence toward dismissing human rights applications by employees who have signed a release. Read about these decisions and tips to make your release enforceable in our latest update
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
2015 Q1 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 2: Retirement and Terminations
Jessica Young explains the inherent risks associated with “encouraging” employees to retire.
21 Apr 2015
Human Rights Tribunal Rules on Family Status Protection for Infrequent and Unexpected Childcare Obligations
A recent Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decision confirms that family status protection may require employers to accommodate employees’ sporadic…
20 Apr 2016
Human Rights Tribunal Finds that WSIB Discriminated Against an Injured Worker for Refusing to Provide Direct Deposit of Benefit Payments
An injured worker has succeeded in a human rights application against the Workplace Safety Insurance Board (“WSIB”). The case related to a…
26 Nov 2012
Divisional Court provides Guidance as to What Constitutes a Prima Facie Case of Discrimination
In a recent case, Peel Law Association v. Pieters, the Divisional Court overturned a decision of the Human Rights Tribunal finding…
06 Mar 2012
Preferential Treatment for Employees with Active WSIB Claims not Discriminatory
The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the “Tribunal”) recently held that it is not discriminatory for employers to treat disabled…
25 Oct 2017
Blame the Boss An Update on Training Obligations for Employers and Supervisors
Date: September 8, 2023 A New Brunswick court has rejected a supervisor’s attempt to blame his criminal non-compliance with OHS…
11 Sep 2023
Superior Court Applies the “Johnstone Test” for Family Status Discrimination in Wrongful Dismissal Action
By: Jeremy Schwartz and Frank Portman We have written before on the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Johnstone…
04 Feb 2015
British Columbia to Reinstate Human Rights Commission
B.C. Premier John Horgan announced earlier this month that the province will reinstate its Human Rights Commission. Like Ontario, B.C. currently has…
17 Aug 2017
Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints – Landon Young and Jessica Young
Releases Protect Employers from Human Rights Complaints – Landon Young and Jessica Young
12 Aug 2011
What is a Reprisal under the Human Rights Code?
By: Ryan Conlin & Frank Portman A recent case from Ontario’s Human Rights Tribunal is a stark reminder of how…
08 Apr 2014
Fail to Plan? Plan to Fail. Pandemic Planning and Response for HR
The World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. Not since H1N1 and SARS before that, have employers faced…
27 Mar 2020
The Human Rights Tribunal Says No to Forum Shopping
It has been a year since the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”). In…
08 Nov 2012
OLRB opens the door to harassment reprisal complaints under the OHSA
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) recently made an important decision which may represent a significant shift in how it…
08 Jan 2014
Drug Dependency and Denial: Alberta Court of Appeal Rules Denial not a Shield to Discipline
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Employee addiction is a challenging topic for HR professionals. Under Canadian human rights legislation, drug…
27 Aug 2015
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal Awards Five Years of Back Pay and Reinstatement
In a decision that will surely draw attention across the country, the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal has awarded an employee 5 years…
21 Feb 2013