It is a good practice for employers to have employees sign a full and final release when their employment is terminated in order to avoid future law suits arising from the employment relationship. Recent cases of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario illustrate a trend in the jurisprudence toward dismissing human rights applications by employees who have signed a release. Read about these decisions and tips to make your release enforceable in our latest update
Jeremy D. Schwartz / About Author
Related Posts
Holiday Webinar 3: Harassment
Jeremy Schwartz discusses how to avoid and address workplace sexual harassment.
21 Dec 2016
Divisional Court Clarifies Test for a Poisonous Work Environment
When employees allege harassment in human rights complaints, they often refer to the creation of a “poisoned work environment.” A…
16 Jan 2015
2016 Q2 HR-Law Webinar Part 5: ONCA on General Damages
Frank Portman discusses a recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision which greatly increased the scope of general and other damages…
19 Jul 2016
Vaccine Mandates: The Courts and Arbitrators are Weighing In
Date: Dec 06, 2021 Vaccine mandates have been legally and politically controversial in Canada and around the world. We are…
06 Dec 2021
2014 Q2 StringerLLP HR Law Webinar, Segment 4: FCA Establishes New Family Status Test
Allison Taylor discusses the recent Federal Court of Appeal decision which outlined a new, balanced test for family status discrimination…
23 Jul 2014
Court Comments on when Employers can ask for an Independent Medical Examination
Ontario’s Divisional Court recently confirmed that employers have a right to ask employees to undergo an Independent Medical Examination (“IME”)…
16 Aug 2017
OLRB opens the door to harassment reprisal complaints under the OHSA
The Ontario Labour Relations Board (“OLRB”) recently made an important decision which may represent a significant shift in how it…
08 Jan 2014
Holiday Webinar 5: Religious Accommodation
Amanda Boyce discusses accommodation obligations for non-Christian observers.
21 Dec 2016
Blame the Boss An Update on Training Obligations for Employers and Supervisors
Date: September 8, 2023 A New Brunswick court has rejected a supervisor’s attempt to blame his criminal non-compliance with OHS…
11 Sep 2023
Alphabet Soup – Navigating the Waters of SUBs, CERBS, Layoffs, Work-Sharing and Subsidies in the Corona Virus Emergency
Canadian employers have been confronted with a veritable ocean of new government programs, which are designed to help weather the…
16 Apr 2020
Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Opening the Door to Duplicative Litigation?
Since the Supreme Court decision in British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. Figliola (“Figliola”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the…
11 Sep 2013
Brave New Workplace: The Legalization of Recreational Marijuana in Canada
The legalization of marijuana for recreational use will have a profound impact on workplaces across the country. This Webinar examines…
17 Oct 2018
Failure to mitigate reduces damages in Human Rights claim
In the wake of the Divisional Court’s decision in the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board v Fair, human rights damages have been…
07 Nov 2014
Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor…
03 Mar 2017
Drug Dependency and Denial: Alberta Court of Appeal Rules Denial not a Shield to Discipline
By: Landon Young and Jessica Young Employee addiction is a challenging topic for HR professionals. Under Canadian human rights legislation, drug…
27 Aug 2015