HR Blog
Consideration: What’s Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander
![]() |
Published on January 31, 2018 | ![]() |
Stringer LLP |
In a unique set of circumstances, the Ontario Superior Court recently found that changes to an employment contract which benefited an employee were void because the employer did not receive consideration.
employment law, employment litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
Working Notice Inappropriate for Employees Who Cannot Work
![]() |
Published on December 19, 2017 |
The Ontario Superior Court recently awarded an employee on leave due to disability, damages representing the salary he would have earned had he been able to work during the working notice period set by his employer.
employment law, employment litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
No Bonus Entitlement - “Active Employment” Requirement did not Violate ESA
![]() |
Published on December 04, 2017 |
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently denied entitlement to bonus payout to an employee who quit his job. The Court found that the language of the bonus plan, requiring “active employment” as a condition to receive a payout, did not violate the Employment Standards Act.
employment law, employment litigation, employment standards
Ambiguity Killed the Termination Clause
![]() |
Published on November 20, 2017 |
The Ontario Superior Court recently struck down a termination clause in an employment agreement because of a seemingly minor ambiguity.
employment law, employment litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
Short Service Employee gets Four Months’ Pay in Lieu of Reasonable Notice
![]() |
Published on November 16, 2017 |
The Ontario Superior Court recently awarded four months of pay in lieu of reasonable notice to an employee with less than a year of tenure.
employment law, employment litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
Court Limits Bonus Entitlement During Notice Period
![]() |
Published on September 22, 2017 |
So when is an employee entitled to a bonus during the reasonable notice period?
employment law, employment litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
Court Rules that Rejected Separation Packages are to Remain Confidential
![]() |
Published on September 05, 2017 |
It is common practice for employers to offer departing employees, who are being terminated without cause, a separation package in exchange for a signed release from liability. But if the employee rejects the package, the employer may not be allowed to rely on the offer during any subsequent litigation.
employment law, employment litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
Court Awards Significant Costs Award Against Thieving Employee
![]() |
Published on July 21, 2017 |
A recent cost decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice suggests that employers who successfully defend themselves from a wrongful dismissal action by asserting just cause may be entitled to recoup a significant amount of their legal costs.
employment litigation, general litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
Minimizing Mitigation: Court of Appeal gives employee benefit of the doubt
![]() |
Published on July 07, 2017 |
A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision dealt a blow to employers’ ability to credit employee mitigation efforts and income against wrongful dismissal damages.
employment law, employment litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
Honesty is the best policy - Court of Appeal upholds dishonest employee’s dismissal for just cause
![]() |
Published on June 19, 2017 |
Employers are often faced with the galling choice between asserting just cause for termination, and paying potentially large sums of money to departing employees who have been caught lying, cheating, or stealing. Just cause is a very high standard. Often, instead of relying on misconduct or performance issues, employers elect to terminate problem employees without cause.
employment law, employment litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
Bad facts make bad law (for employers): Court recognizes new tort of harassment
![]() |
Published on June 14, 2017 |
The Ontario Superior Court recently recognized a new tort that would allow employees to sue their employers for harassment in civil court.
employment law, employment litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
Mitigating by returning to work: it depends on the circumstances
![]() |
Published on June 02, 2017 |
When must a dismissed employee accept an offer of alternate employment with their employer? In some circumstances, employees will be obligated to accept continued employment with the company that terminated them to mitigate their losses. A recent Court of Appeal decision reminds us, however, that an employer’s offer must meet certain conditions or else the employee may refuse to accept it.
employment law, employment litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
Generous termination clauses: Think twice before making promises
![]() |
Published on April 28, 2017 |
Many employers include termination clauses in employment contracts to limit their liability when dismissing employees. When employers draft generous termination provisions providing for more than statutory minimums, they must follow through on that generosity when terminating employees. Failing to do so could leave employers exposed to full liability under the common law.
employment law, employment litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach
![]() |
Published on March 03, 2017 |
The law on addiction has evolved over the years in arbitral jurisprudence. Earlier decisions treated illness as a mitigating factor on penalty. In more recent decisions, arbitrators have treated the human rights accommodation analysis as relevant to the assessment of the gravity and culpability of misconduct itself.
employment law, employment litigation, human rights, labour law
No evidence? No aggravated damages – Employees must prove basis for damages based on manner of dismissal
![]() |
Published on February 08, 2017 |
Court affirms there must be sufficient evidence that the employer’s conduct was egregious before an award of aggravatedCourt affirms there must be sufficient evidence that the employer’s conduct was egregious before an award of aggravated damages is appropriate. damages is appropriate.
employment law, employment litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation

Recent Blog
Categories
- accessibility for ontarians with disabilities act
- aoda
- class actions
- constitutional law
- construction labour relations
- constructive dismissal
- disability benefits
- employment contracts
- employment insurance
- employment law
- employment litigation
- employment standards
- fiduciary duties
- first nations
- foodora
- general litigation
- human rights
- immigration
- labour law
- labour laws
- labour relations
- occupational health and safety
- privacy
- stringer llp
- stringer llp announcements
- stringerllp announcements
- unionization
- workers compensation
- workers' compensation
- wrongful dismissal litigation