Management Lawyers
HR Blog
Court Awards Significant Costs Award Against Thieving Employee
 |
Published on July 21, 2017 |
A recent cost decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice suggests that employers who successfully defend themselves from a wrongful dismissal action by asserting just cause may be entitled to recoup a significant amount of their legal costs.
employment litigation, general litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
Termination Clauses: A Cautionary Tale
| |
Published on January 21, 2015 |
In cases dealing with particularly senior and specialized employees, significant notice periods may be awarded even for employees with short service. this is starkly illustrated by a recent case from the Ontario Superior Court.
employment law, general litigation, wrongful dismissal litigation
When Can an Employer Rely on a Limitation Period when Unilaterally Changing a Contract?
| |
Published on February 28, 2014 |
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently released its decision in Ali v O-Two Medical, which highlights the risks of taking a wait-and-see approach when giving notice of significant changes to employment terms and conditions.
Confidentiality Clause has Teeth: Police Officer forced to Return Settlement Funds
| |
Published on August 29, 2013 |
A recent arbitration case shows that arbitrators (and potentially other decision makers) will take a very hard line on employees who deliberately breach their obligations.
general litigation, labour relations
Office Holiday Parties - The Fine Print
| |
Published on December 14, 2012 |
We've put together a few tips on enjoying your office party without facing lawsuits in the cold light of day.
employment law, general litigation, human rights, occupational health and safety
Avoid the Hassle of Litigation's Draft your Agreements with Care
| |
Published on July 10, 2012 |
In a recent decision, Downey v. Encore International Inc., the Ontario Court of Appeal took a flexible approach based heavily on the factual circumstances in finding that a confidentiality agreement was enforceable.
Conservative Majority to Appoint 2 New Supreme Court Justices
| |
Published on May 13, 2011 |
The CBC News reports that Supreme Court of Canada Justices Ian Binnie and Louise Charron have announced they will retire on August 30, 2011. With the newly elected, Conservative majority government, Canadians will no doubt watch the nomination and selection process with greater interest.
Subscribe to Blog feed
Recent Blog
- Working Notice Inappropriate for Employees Who Cannot Work
- No Bonus Entitlement - “Active Employment” Requirement did not Violate ESA
- Stringer LLP - Prize in Labour Law
- Change is Coming: Bill 148: Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act Passes Third Reading
- Ambiguity Killed the Termination Clause
- Short Service Employee gets Four Months’ Pay in Lieu of Reasonable Notice
- Preferential Treatment for Employees with Active WSIB Claims not Discriminatory
- Overtime Averaging: No Notice, No Harm, No Foul
- Court Gives Guidance as to When OHSA Prosecutions May Lead to Jail Time
- Court Limits Bonus Entitlement During Notice Period
- Court of Appeal Rules on Employers’ Obligations to Protect Employees from Harassment and Violence when they are Away from the Workplace
- Court Rules that Rejected Separation Packages are to Remain Confidential
- Can a Defendant be Charged Criminally After Pleading Guilty to OHSA Charges?
- Avoid Procedural Missteps when Accommodating Mental Disabilities in the Workplace
- British Columbia to Reinstate Human Rights Commission
- Court Comments on when Employers can ask for an Independent Medical Examination
- Smoked Out: Employer Convicted When Employee Smokes in Truck
- Court Awards Significant Costs Award Against Thieving Employee
- Minimizing Mitigation: Court of Appeal gives employee benefit of the doubt
- Honesty is the best policy - Court of Appeal upholds dishonest employee’s dismissal for just cause
- Bad facts make bad law (for employers): Court recognizes new tort of harassment
- Mitigating by returning to work: it depends on the circumstances
- Is it work-related? Novel workers’ compensation decisions deal with harassment and assault
- Private member’s Bill seeks union-favourable amendments, without waiting for the Changing Workplaces Review
- Generous termination clauses: Think twice before making promises
- May 3 - Ryan and Jeremy to Present on Marijuana in the Workplace at WSPS Conference
- Using independent contractor not a “get out of jail free” card
- Constructive dismissal? A question of interpretation
- March 31 - Last day for early bird registration
- The Accidental Termination
- Addiction without compulsion: no defence to serious misconduct using the “hybrid” approach
- Probationary clauses: A double-edged sword for employers
- No evidence? No aggravated damages – Employees must prove basis for damages based on manner of dismissal
- Alberta court rules on the limits of good faith in the performance of employment contracts
- When a resignation isn’t really a resignation
- “Uncommon” employers – Corporate Structure vs Employment Obligations
Categories
- accessibility for ontarians with disabilities act
- aoda
- class actions
- constitutional law
- construction labour relations
- constructive dismissal
- disability benefits
- employment insurance
- employment law
- employment litigation
- employment standards
- fiduciary duties
- first nations
- general litigation
- human rights
- immigration
- labour law
- labour relations
- occupational health and safety
- privacy
- stringer llp
- stringer llp announcements
- workers compensation
- workers' compensation
- wrongful dismissal litigation
