HR Blog

HR Blog
June, 2010
|
Published on June 15, 2010 | |
Stringer LLP Admin |
The U.S. Labour Department has recently commenced an initiative to require employers to prepare and adopt compliance plans to ensure they do not violate wage, job safety and equal employment laws. The announcement was accompanied by an expression of the desire by Labour Secretary Seth Harris that his department foster a “culture of compliance” amoung employers, as opposed to a complaint-driven system in which the employers are “caught” not complying. The intent is for employers to prepare written plans designed to prevent violations of workplace laws, including plans to address safety hazards in the workplace.
The plan is focused in particular on recent wage violations in restaurants and discount retailing, as well as safety violations in coal mining and construction. Another focus is on the widespread use of independent contractors to avoid paying Social Security taxes and to avoid wage laws. In future, employers will have to provide a written explanation to the Labour Department to explain their use of contractors, and to provide a similar explanation to those workers.
Not surprisingly, employers have reacted negatively, alleging micromanagement of their businesses. Pro-labour commentators have also expressed concerns regarding the potential superficiality of such plans.
Since trends in the United States frequently precede similar trends in Canada, it remains to be seen whether Canadian provinces eventually follow suit to ensure compliance with labour laws. A greater culture of compliance exists in Canada than in the United States, but recessions typically lead to some avoidance of labour standards and it is to be expected that any slackening of compliance during the recession may be met with a similar initiative down the road.
employment law, employment standards
Subscribe to Blog feed
Recent Blog
- Court Signals Summary Judgement Often Appropriate for Wrongful Dismissal Actions
- Minister Jason Kenney Announces changes to the Immigration System to Promote Canadian Labour Market
- Landmark Decision on Certification of ESA Class Actions and Constructive Dismissal
- OLRB rules on electrician exemption in construction regulation
- What Does the Crown Have to Prove in an OHSA Prosecution?
- The Supreme Court to Lay Down the Law on Random Alcohol Testing
- OLRB Directs Inspector to Produce Investigation Records
- Employer Successfully Defends a Charge of Failing to Report an Accident to WSIB
- Minor Change to the OLRB’s Rules of Procedure could have a Major Impact
- Debate Continues over Family Caregiver Leave
- Divisional Court provides Guidance as to What Constitutes a Prima Facie Case of Discrimination
- Forum Shopping a Growing Problem - Published in The Lawyers Weekly
- Bill 168 and Section 50 of the OHSA: Has the Labour Board Closed the Floodgates?
- Proposed Family Caregiver Leave goes through Second Reading
- British Columbia Court of Appeal upholds just cause dismissal
- The Latest on Forum Shopping: The Human Rights Tribunal is Considering Whether a WSIB Case Manager Decision is a “Proceeding”
- Employees in fiduciary relationships may be entitled to bonuses even upon breach of duties
- ONCA Upholds Brito but Quashes Punitive Award
- Invasion of Privacy in the Workplace Could Lead to Liability for Snooping Employees
- Human Rights Tribunal Heeding Clear Direction from Supreme Court
- Taking a Hard Line on Termination Entitlements Ends Up Costing More
Categories
- aoda
- class actions
- construction labour relations
- constructive dismissal
- disability benefits
- employment insurance
- employment law
- employment standards
- fiduciary duties
- first nations
- general litigation
- human rights
- immigration
- labour law
- occupational health and safety
- privacy
- restrictive covenants
- stringer llp announcements
- workers' compensation
- wrongful dismissal litigation


